According to Acts 1:15-26, during the days after the Ascension,
Peter stood up in the midst of the brothers (about 120 of Jesus’
followers). Now that Judas had betrayed his ministry, it was necessary,
Peter said, to fulfill the scriptural recommendation that another should
take his office. “Therefore, it is necessary that one of the men who
accompanied us the whole time the Lord Jesus came and went among us,
beginning from the baptism of John until the day on which he was taken
up from us, become with us a witness to his resurrection” (Acts
1:21-22).
They nominated two men: Joseph Barsabbas and Matthias. They
prayed and drew lots. The choice fell upon Matthias, who was added to
the Eleven.
Matthias is not mentioned by name anywhere else in the New Testament.
Comment: What was the holiness of Matthias? Obviously he was
suited for apostleship by the experience of being with Jesus from his
baptism to his ascension. He must also have been suited personally, or
he would not have been nominated for so great a responsibility. Must we
not remind ourselves that the fundamental holiness of Matthias was his
receiving gladly the relationship with the Father offered him by Jesus
and completed by the Holy Spirit? If the apostles are the foundations of
our faith by their witness, they must also be reminders, if only
implicitly, that holiness is entirely a matter of God’s giving, and it
is offered to all, in the everyday circumstances of life. We receive,
and even for this God supplies the power of freedom.
Quote: Jesus speaks of the apostles’ function of
being judges, that is, rulers. He said, “Amen, I say to you that you who
have followed me, in the new age, when the Son of Man is seated on his
throne of glory, will yourselves sit on twelve thrones, judging the
twelve tribes of Israel” (Matthew 19:28). |
No comments:
Post a Comment